Without going into the pros and cons
of the article here, I would like to
add here one of my personal
experiences about IIT-JEE exams.
I appeared for JEE in 1997 and 1998.
While I got very poor rank in 1997,
my AIR was fairly decent in early
300s. To me, in both of these JEE
entrance tests I found that I got
the rank which I deserved based on
my intellect level and more
importantly my coolness in applying
that intellect at the moment when it
really mattered, on the exam day.
During my intense preparation since
class 12th, I very well realised
that there is no point mugging and
cramming formulas and whatever is
there in the text book. You've got
to be fairly smart and intelligent
to apply whatever is being taught in
those books and classrooms. It was
further validated when I spent four
years in IIT Bombay when I got the
opportunity to interact with some of
the brightest minds in my age group.
There was no way that I could have
done better than some of the guys
who won gold/silver medals in
International Mathematics Olympiad,
International Physics Olympiad and
so on. Some of those guys were
simply more intelligent and no
matter how much "totagiri" I would
have done, I would have still done
second to them.
The point here is that I contest the
claim of the author that any "tota"
can get top notch marks in JEE. I
don't know this is just my personal
experience or maybe I was not a good
enough "tota". Also, I am not
familiar with JEE post-1998, so I
can't really comment about the
quality of those guys making through
it. I don't know if you have
prepared for JEE, you would find
that JEE-95 paper was simply the
best entrance paper and only a
handful who were really smart and
brilliant enough could crack it.
Some of the Physics problems in 1995
were simply just awesome which could
clearly separate the brilliants from
the mediocre minds. If the author is
an IIT'ian, I am sure he would
realise what I am saying. If not,
then I would request him to ask
around his friends and family who
would, I am sure, vouch for what I
am saying.
Another point is that none of the
IIT'ian has won Nobel prize. Again I
would beg to differ here. IIT
teaches the student how to be a good
engineer, a smart technocrat and we
are not selected or educated in
science. Even in spite of this, if
you look around top notch US
universities, some of these IIT'ian
guys are doing mind-boggling
fundamental research in engineering
science. If Nobel prize was given in
Chemical Engineering, I am sure you
would have seen at least one IIT'ian,
there is no doubt about that.
Personally I believe that creativity
is something that you are born with,
you are not taught to be creative.
By its nature, creativity is
something that is difficult to be
taught and there is not a good way
to measure it too. IIT or no IIT,
India or US, medieval age or modern
age, I don't think you can teach me
to be creative. Edison was not
taught to be creative in US schools,
he was born with a knack of
experimenting things. He used to
perform weird experiments even when
he lost his eye. And so looks like
our Raghav bhai. Nobody taught him
to be creative, he is just like
that. All we can do is to provide a
good environment to let such guys
succeed when such minds show their
talent in formative years. -
Ravindra Kumar, Boston, USA - Apr.
15, 2006
Mr Som has made some great points.
When I was in IIT, even within the
IITs, I found that the brightest
students were not the ones who
scored the best marks in the
entrance exams. We don't find a
single IIT'ian who has not won a
Nobel prize whereas in UK/US we find
even the state universities have
Nobel prize winning professors, this
is a red flag. Recently it was found
that an extremely large number of
the IIT'ians were coming from
coaching institutes run in a small
town called Kota in Rajasthan. This
raised serious concerns regarding
the quality of the entrance exams
and even the IIT directors had a
meeting to find out what was
happening. I don't know what came of
the meeting but if some PD readers
are up to date with this then please
let us know.
Creativity can be taught from an
early age. Anyone who sends his
children to a primary school in
UK/US can attest to this fact. The
school system here uses games, fun
activities, crafts, arts, live
projects, field trips, excursions,
writing assignments, discussions,
debates, student presentations and
so on and so forth to nurture
creativity. The highest marks are
allocated for creative activities.
Creativity is not merely inherited
otherwise all the top scientists
will only have scientist kids.
Creativity does not lasts forever
and if not nurtured properly right
from a young age, it dies. - Rajesh
Sahu, Manchester, UK
"I have a message for the world,
which I will deliver without fear
and care for the future. To the
reformers I will point out that I am
a greater reformer than any one of
them. They want to reform only
little bits. I want root-and-branch
reform." - Swami Vivekananda
Wait 50-100 years more ,things will
change. The natural process of
social and scientific developments
will again take us back to era of
Aryabhatta. The older I grow, the
better I seem to think of India and
such other time-honored institutions
of India. There was a time when I
used to think that many of them were
useless and worthless, but the older
I grow, the more I seem to feel a
difference in cursing any one of
them, for each one of them is the
embodiment of the experience of
centuries.
I tell the world first form a stable
society like ours and then take me
to moon with your innovative ideas
of science and technology. Whatever
they are telling me now I have
already heard in the stories of
Ramayana and Mahabharata .
Many texts speak of the relativity
of time and space---abstract
concepts that developed in the
scientific context just a hundred
years ago. The Puranas speak of
countless universes, time flowing at
different rates for different
observers and so on.
The Mahabharata speaks of an embryo
being divided into one hundred parts
each becoming, after maturation in a
separate pot, a healthy baby; this
is how the Kaurava brothers are
born. There is also mention of an
embryo, conceived in one womb, being
transferred to the womb of another
woman from where it is born; the
transferred embryo is Balarama and
this is how he is a brother to
Krishna although he was born to
Rohini and not to Devaki. There is
an ancient mention of space
travellers wearing airtight suits in
the epic Mahabharata which may be
classified as an early form of
science fiction.
Universes defined recursively are
described in the famous episode of
Indra and the ants in Brahmavaivarta
Purana. Here Vishnu, in the guise of
a boy, explains to Indra that the
ants he sees walking on the ground
have all been Indras in their own
solar systems in different times!
These flights of imagination are to
be traced to more than a
straightforward generalization of
the motions of the planets into a
cyclic universe. They must be viewed
in the background of an amazingly
sophisticated tradition of cognitive
and analytical thought.
Our rich scientific achievements are
not well documented. For example;
the evolution of Indian medicine is
not as well documented as that of
Indian mathematics. Neither do we
understand well the manner in which
the philosophical basis underlying
Indian science evolved. But one
thing of which I am very clear about
is India will regain it super status
say for example "AIDS is due to
western living concept". People are
going to one life partner concept as
mentioned in our Ramayan .
Therefore, I am very hopeful our
education system will revolve and
reinvent itself. - Narayan Prasad
- Apr. 15, 2006
I felt like laughing my guts out
when I read this write-up from my
fellow reader. I am extremely
disappointed. The facts presented
here gives me an impression that
author has spent most of his life
here in US (read some of his
previous articles which reeks of US
sycophancy) or has taken a ignorant
swipe thinking most of his fellow
readers will be sitting ducks with
no self pride. For your kind
information the premier engineering
institutes including but not limited
to IITs and RECs boast of the most
intelligent brains of the country.
Such shallow depictions on a
national forum with utter disregard
for facts and figures is
unpardonable and leaves our national
institutions in very poor light. IIT
entrance exams cannot be cleared
just on pure "parrotism". It is not
your class 10 board exams where you
have those exam cram questions that
you mug up and get straight As. So
Mr Vishwakarma get your facts right.
IIT is not some tota maina ki kahani
as you have bluntly put it. And just
incase you didn’t know most of the
top IITians and RECians are already
stationed at the premier institutes
in US. Most of the graduate and
post-graduate programs are over
stacked with Asians mostly Chinese
and Indians. They are on full
scholarship enrolled in some of the
top-notch research carried out in
the country. There are many I can
list but time and space is always a
consideration. But anyways here is
one for the record - Having worked
on Param 10000 Supercomputers myself
at the CDAC National Supercomputing
facility in Pune, I kept myself
abreast with the supercomputing
world and recently a breakout news
made me really proud. What does it
take to make the world's fourth
fastest supercomputer at a cost of 5
million USD (the cheapest available
today). It takes an Indian by the
name Srinivas Varadarajan (an ex-REC'ian
from Warangal who came to US in
1994) research professor at Virginia
Tech heading a crew which lived on
pizzas and football tickets on a 18
hour shift for 1 month and 1100
Apple Macintosh machines. There are
many more budding Vadarajans waiting
in the wings in India's top
engineering and medical institutes.
What they lack is a sound
technological fabric on their home
soil. A fortiori they flee for
greener pastures.
I have done my masters in Computer
Science from a respectable
institution in US with straight As
in all my courses and believe it or
not the level of any of the exams
here were nowhere close to the IIT
entrance I took 12 years ago. People
are mostly in awe of IITs and IIMs
because the foundation that is laid
out is extremely solid. Parrots will
quit the exam hall after reading the
first question on the entrance.
However I do agree partly with you
on the research programs that are
being pursued in IITs and other
premier institutions. It has not
inspired much confidence in
breakthrough technological
advancements but if you see Indians
doing well in US it is because of
the conducive and productive
environment one is bred in to
showcase their vast talents. The
example above of Varadarajan is one
such. Do you know he flew from Tata
Unisys after working there for a day
because of bond enforcements.
As for your visionary statements
that deride Indians who come here on
H1B and your extension of that
derision by comparing them with the
CEOs the CIOs and the CFOs, I find
it superfluous and your logic over
flawed. H1Bs are on visitor's
program and have to spend
considerable time coming on Green
Card and eventually citizenship. How
do you expect them to compete with
Americans on their own soil, being
at such a disadvantage? I have
friends who have been here for quite
some time doing very well for
themselves and holding very
respectable positions.
I think you are still mired in the
lure of USA. Wake Up Mr Som because
US is no longer perceived as the
land of opportunities. The reverse
brain drain in recent times suggests
that. Do some basic groundwork and
your falsification or ignorance will
be exposed. Scout out the list of
PhD programs in top-notch institutes
here and count out the Indians
enrolled in such programs,
professors as well as students. I
agree US has earned a name for
itself in technological advancements
but please be mindful of the fact
that part of the credit goes to the
countless engineers like us who form
their workforce. We cannot be in top
management positions because the law
of the jungle does not permits us
to. Please don’t expect us to become
Mike Eskews or Steve Balmers
overnight. We are happy being
Varadarajans.
Once again get your facts right else
your articles will become a laughing
stock for many. Proud to be an
Indian! - Siddharth Verma - Apr.
15, 2006
Mr. Siddharth Verma has not offered
a single logical rebuttal of the
article except for some blind and
fake patriotic ranting. He has
proven the authors point of Indians
being satisfied and proud in little
technician's achievements. US needs
Indian and Chinese technicians since
the American kids are mostly busy
trying to sleep with as many girls
as possible. Being good in studies
is considered as 'geeky' in US
whereas being popular with the girls
is the ultimate prize. But
eventually some Americans grow out
of this and do quality research. If
you want to know how the Americans
really think about Indians checkout
the Asok character in the Dilbert
comic strip. Asok constantly rants
about being from a top notch Indian
school but is fooled and used by
anybody and everybody without
getting any reward for his efforts.
Many Indians propagate the myth that
30% of NASA engineers are Indians,
50% of Microsoft employees are
Indians but these are all
exaggerated figures. You are right
Mr Vishwakarma bringing about a
paradigm shift is difficult. Indians
need to start getting more
ambitious.
P.S: I did my B.Tech from BITS,
Pilani. Mr. Vishwakarma I would have
been happy if you would have
included BITS in the list of good
Indian institutes too, just kidding!
- Rajendra Kumar - Apr.
15, 2006
Mr. Rajendra Kumar,
You response and generalization of
all the Indian, Chinese and American
students is nothing but ludicrous
bordering on being outright
offensive. I wonder how could you
categorize all the mind blowing
research work done by these very
fine Indian and Chinese scientists,
technocrats as being a technicians
work. I spent couple of years doing
PhD work at one of the best
universities in the world with some
of best Indian professors in
biotechnology, proteomics and I was
amazed by their inventiveness,
capabilities and sheer talent. This
is just a few that I was closely
involved in the research work. I
could find such amazing researchers
in all these conferences that I
happened to attend during the thesis
work. If you want some cold facts,
check out the DOE, NSF website and
find out that every year invariably
there are couple of Asian professors
who are awarded funding, support and
EARLY CAREER awards. Now that is a
no mean achievement if you have
happened to spend some time in
research world. How could you call
all these very fine researchers a
technician ? Do you even realise the
value of their research? All
scientific and technological
research is not done in disruptive
or iPod like manner that you can
change the world in just one
brilliant piece of innovation.
Research is done in incremental
manner and each Nobel prize is a
work of decades of research, where
the person gets the award really
stands on the shoulder of so many
giants in the field who have done
years of research. I am really
amazed by your boldness here and
would urge you not to criticize
something that you do not understand
or refuse to understand.
I find your categorization of all
American boys as simply skirt
chasers similarly offensive. What
are you talking about is nothing but
a high school mentality of all the
kids in the world, be it India,
America or Africa. Did you forget
the DPS episode in India ? Will you
take that as indicators of all the
kids in India ? Did you forget you
school and college days so early ? I
have studied with some of these very
fine American kids who are equally
smart and intelligent in every way.
I wonder if you live in a bubble or
what that you do not see all these
people ?
Last but not least, being an IIT'ian
myself and a hardcore Dilbert fan, I
don't find the Asok character
offensive or cheap portrayal in any
way. It is just a satirical and
funny way to portray the ever
growing, omnipresent Indian techies
in all the field. Sometimes, its
good to not take ourselves too
seriously and try to see the humor.
Now, coming to the topic here I
would thank Siddharth for writing a
very honest summation here.
Obviously Mr. Rajendra Kumar fails
to see the importance of amazing
research work by ppl like Mr
Vardarajan. Or the Indian professor
whose idea led to Google News
application in the Google homepage.
In spite of all these visa,
immigration challenges, cultural
barriers, Asian communities are
contributing positively in the US
society here in so many ways and I
am sure one day you would find
Indian CEOs, CFOs too in all the
field. Personally, I believe that if
I do not become a CEO in future, it
reflects more on my talent, business
acumen than anything else. I believe
that American dream is still alive
and full of opportunities. We should
be more focusing on doubling our
efforts than looking at the
negatives that may or may not be
there. - Ravindra Kumar, USA -
Apr. 16, 2006
Rajendra Kumar, your comments show
the hollowness of your knowledge. I
don't know why PD even bothers to
put comments like yours and some
others who frequent this web site
except maybe to put you in the
public court. - Vikas Agrawal,
USA - Apr. 16, 2006
I agree with the fact that rote
learning has reduced creativity of
general Indian students. But even
more responsible are exams like JEE
and CAT, for which students give
away most valuable periods of life
to coaching.
Nearly 30 years back when I went to
IIT situation was not so bad since
there was still chance of students
being able to compete in JEE etc
without coaching institutes. Today
it seems almost an impossible task.
However, writing such articles and
discussing it does not change the
situation a single bit. I support an
organization active in Patna to make
this change called - "Association
for Promotion of Creative Learning (APCL)",
which also runs a "School of
Creative Learning" in rural Patna.
You can visit its website "www.creativelearningpatna.org"
and if you do happen to be in Patna
sometime, you can go and see for
yourself their activities in
changing "Chalk and Talk" method of
learning.
May be by creating more such
organization or supporting such
organizations, we may create more
lateral thinking brain in India and
Bihar and improve creativity. Today
many companies are shifting their
design centres to India and their
success will depend partly on how we
can develop the mind of young
Indians effectively. - Prof.
Prabhat Ranjan, Professor, Ph.D. (UC
Berkeley) - Apr. 16, 2006
Mr Rajendra Kumar,
My reply to the original article has
its own share of logical
counterarguments. If you cannot see
it then its not my problem.
Mr Som has wrongly depicted IITs and
other engineering institutes and
bluntly assaulted the credibility of
these engineering colleges. Rote
based learning is not a part of any
of these premier engineering
institutes as my fellow colleague Mr
Ravindra opined. I am sure you will
agree with me if you are a BITS
Pilani graduate.
I have friends all over UK and US at
the top institutions who are
involved in research areas like nano
technology, stochastic optimization
techniques for AI, space
exploration, genetic science and
other IT based development projects.
So to throw Indians in such poor
light on advanced research is not
acceptable. Run through voluminous
piles of of IEEE, AICHE, APS, ACS,
Science journals and you will see
what kind of contributions they have
delivered. I was involved in some
research work at CDAC Pune in
collaboration with National Chemical
Labs, Pune working on optimization
of bio-molecular protein structures
using Artificial Intelligence
techniques on PARAM workstations.
The research did find a meritorious
publication and model lease-out to
top American research firm in US.
You wanted BITS Pilani mentioned
because you feel proud to be BTECH
graduate from there. What makes you
think that research carried out by
Varadarajan is not a breakthrough
one and something to feel proud of.
What makes you think raving about
his achievements reeks of patriotic
ranting? May be you are not aware of
the kind of leverage it adds to the
supercomputing arsenal. I picked
this just to prove a point. There
are so many examples I can give you.
It just struck me a news from couple
of years ago two Indian kids both
aged 14 were picked by NASA for
their Mars Exploration Rover Mission
at the Jet Propulsion Labs in
Pasadena CA. The competition lasted
six months trying to tap child
prodigies with creativity and
imagination. I can give you scores
of other examples. Indians don't get
recognition because of their
intrinsic low profile they maintain.
Even your rationale on Noble Prize
has not been rightly judged because
you are not aware of the ground
realities. Do you know there have
been several instances where a
deserving Indian did not get
recognition for his work and someone
who had started later bagged the
Nobel Prize. I quote it from none
other than the recipient himself by
the name Amartya Sen who was
speaking to R Mashelkar, Director
CSIR (ex Director NCL), just before
he won it in 1998 for Economics.
This is what he said - "do you know
Dr Mashelkar, you have to be ten
times as good to win the Nobel
Prize, if you are an Indian!". Some
of the work for which Glauber has
been winning Nobel Prizes on Quantum
Theory of Optical Coherence has
already been done by ECG Sudarshan,
an Indian national in US. And look
at this amazing stats - Over 100 yrs
there have been 776 Nobel Prizes
given out. In the field of science
only 3 have gone to a developing
nation. One is your very own CV
Raman. If you are intelligent you
can figure out why. I can list
scores of other names who have been
victims of their own color and
nationality.
As for Indians working on surround
technologies and not at the helm of
decision making it is because you
will rarely weave and work your way
up to a top management position in a
foreign country. You should be happy
that you are at least allowed to
come here and avail the resources
that you can. Most of the Indians
whom I personally know either opened
their own startup firm here in
States or did so after going back.
Indians barrage US shores in large
numbers so you cannot expect
everyone to be a top research
scientist. You will see IT engineers
and doctors doing very well for
themselves. In a foreign country you
don't get a level playing field. I
can give you scores of examples
where a deserving Indian will be
ignored for a not so deserving
American on grounds of color and
race. I agree there are lot many
bright Americans too but they are
more ensconced on the top managerial
positions. Having personally worked
at positions where I had to
constantly interact with the VPs and
top decision makers I know one thing
for sure, credibility of an Indian
is never doubted. Trust me they take
your surmises and assessments very
seriously. Hardly there has been an
instance in my own case where
something that I suggested to the
top management was not included in
the business model. Indians are
doing very well for themselves. The
average household income of an
Indian American is much more than
the national US income.
What makes you think IT development
or medical profession does not need
intelligence. Recently one of my
friends who is Asst Vice President,
IT at Bank of New York developed an
extremely niche software that he
sold to a top leading business firm
in US with exclusive copyrights.
Indians have
talents/creativity/intelligence in
abundance, what we lack is a
breeding ground. India does not
provide it because the government
policies dont encourage advanced
research funding to ISRO, BARC, ISc,
CDAC, NCL etc etc. And so the
exodus.
I do agree with the author on
parrotism as a concern in elementary
and high school education where
learning by rote is quite pervading.
That is what needs to be changed.
But to hold IITs, BITS and RECs in
same light is a bit too far fetched.
I am a big lobbyist when it comes to
"learning by discovery" or "Out of
the box thinking" myself but it will
take time before nation-wide
educational reforms take center
stage.
Asok's character in a Dilbert comic
strip is a brainchild of a
cartoonist. It does not necessarily
overlay the sentiments of million
other Americans. - Siddhartha
Verma - Apr. 16, 2006
Somji, some rote learning has to be
done in school level anywhere on
this planet. At school level,
subjects like Biology, Zoology,
Sanskrit, English, Hindi and some
portion of Chemistry etc. Do require
some amount of rote learning which
can not be avoided. I personally do
not think rote learning goes beyond
school level in India. If you have
studied at good educational
institutions, you are certainly not
a parrot.
As to why Indians do not land Nobel
Prizes, Shri. Siddhartha Verma has
rightly pointed out that it is not
which bird you are but the color of
your feathers that becomes an
important consideration. There are
very smart dark colored birds. While
we all acknowledge their smartness
but, in denial, some of us call them
dumb parrots and refuse to glorify
them. In the larger interest, the
Americans have gone beyond that
point. Though they too refuse to
glorify them, they have a fairly
large collection of these smart
birds. They use their intelligence
but they do not want to hang the
cages in the drawing room. That
place is for birds with brighter
feathers. - Rajesh Chaubey - Apr.
16, 2006
Dear Sirs,
Please do not lose your cool , lets
have a healthy debate rather than an
ugly argument which would lead to
nothing.
Please do not get your egos so
flattened as to forget the sanctity
of this forum, I understand that
many great writers who have superior
command on the language visit and
write on this forum but that does
not entitle them to write and post
whatever pleases them.. I hope that
you are getting the feelers???
I have always seen that whenever
there is a comment posted on a
particular topic and it does not
pleases a reader he goes on a verbal
duel rampaging and ranting about
what is right and what is wrong but
never coming to the point.
Mr. Rajendra has written very
correctly and if few IIT'ians feel
embarrassed then it is their choice.
Yes we Indians are same like ASOK
people use us and make us feel
intelligent and we then argue and
debate with our own fellowmen? this
is simply ridiculous and high time
that we Indians take on the world in
our own style.
We are the suckers and always at
receiving end, I hope very IIT'ian
knows how much government spends in
creating an engineer it is roughly
Rs. 1 Crore or USD 230,000 but how
much fees one pays, peanuts!!!
Now the fellow IIT'ians getting
trained get to the USA where they
are used by the Americans and they
feel elated to make fast bucks.
Has any American company sponsored
any IIT grad? it is our own
resources that has gone in to
educate a individual who works for
the foreigners.
IIT'ians or any top notch guy or any
scientist does not have a moral
right to conquest his case when some
one writes something about them and
if they do so then they are the
worst lost of hypocrites in this
world.
It pains to see these people
fighting with their brethren and
thinking themselves to be super
intelligent.
We are an incomplete country and
will remain so if we just spend our
funds creating engineers who desert
their country and make other country
successful, do research for other
companies who earn a fortune from
our own country in terms of services
and supplies.
Sorry!! last but not the least ,
please remain wherever you are there
is no remorse but at least let the
people say what is in their mind. -
Sanjay Gupta - Apr. 16, 2006
Dear Mr. Gupta
It's very easy for you to lecture
someone and ask them not to get
upset while you and your friends go
on on an open forum like this and
openly belittle IIT'ians. And if we
(the IIT'ians and ex-IIT'ians)
defend ourselves, we are labeled as
hypocrites.
Please spare us the lectures. This
is a clear case of sour grapes for
people like you, Mr. Vishwakarma,
Mr. Prasad, and Mr. Rajendra Kumar
who obviously failed to get
themselves in the IITs and now hold
a lifelong grudge against all those
who made it into it despite tough
competitions. What do you think IIT
is? Ganesh Pathshala of Patna? Have
you ever been a student of IIT? If
not, then quit making accusations
about something you don't have a
clue about.
There is an old saying: "if you
don't have anything better to say
about someone, don't say anything at
all." You and your buddies will do
yourselves a big favor if you paid
attention to it.
Don't expect us to take your abuse
lying down. If you insult us, expect
to hear from us too. There is
nothing hypocritical about it. You
will do the same if someone hurled
abuses on you.
Last time I checked on this
forum, you are based in Thailand. If
we are slave labors in the USA, what
are you in Thailand, its king? And
if you don't understand the humor in
a cartoon character perhaps it's not
for people like you. Don't tell me
you don't stereotype Americans,
French, Chinese, Blacks, Sardarjis
and so on and so forth. I assume you
have never heard or repeated a
Sardarji joke in your life. - Vikas Agrawal,
USA - Apr. 17, 2006
Dear Mister Vikas Agarwal,
I do not understand one thing that
why have you guys taken everything
personally and are now sending
comments with venom.
Firstly what is true cannot be
hidden under the garb of falsehood
and ignorance and whatever I have
written I stand by it, I do not know
any of the other writers whose names
you have mentioned and have never
ever been in touch with them , this
is the only medium through which we
have interacted.
Getting into IIT was never my dream
therefore I went into Humanities
stream so getting jealous of your
achievements and cursing you is not
my forte so kindly do not just read
the electric part of my comment but
also the humane part.
I am in Thailand working for an
Indian group , I got a chance to to
work in the USA but somehow I did
not opt for the same due to the same
fact that I did not want to work for
a company who did not serve any
interest of my nation and the salary
was very good may be not in 6
figures but quite handsome.
It also pains me to think that why
have you been so critical of my
comments , I know that I have
displeased the IIT'ians but today or
tomorrow they will also realise what
I mean and I have no regrets for
having written the stark truth.
Lastly , if you again feel that I
have written something derogatory
and to defame some people then I
profusely apologise for it. -
Sanjay Gupta - Apr. 17, 2006
Dr. Prabhat Ranjan, thank you for
providing the link to the creative
learning institute. I am so happy to
see that you are walking the talk.
The people in the surrounding area
are blessed and lucky to have such a
fine school in their neighborhood. I
have done research in one of the
research institutes I have mentioned
AND I have done my education at one
of the educational institutes
mentioned in the original article
AND I have been an H1B visa holder.
It's shameful that people lack the
maturity and character to do valid
self-criticism and use rational
arguments but instead rely on
personal attacks. What I find truly
amazing is that whenever someone
asks a single question about a
certain institute, people from that
institute act like religious
fanatics. May be we should all stop
condemning fanatics since we are all
blind fanatics but have our own holy
cows. It's saddening that years of
collage haven't opened some peoples
mind, man are they in the deepest
slumber or what! Passing the JEE
exam is the biggest event in these
peoples lives instead of being a
step in doing something big. In fact
the bigger event could have been the
4 years in the institute itself or
better still it could have been
creating jobs for say 100 families
or even better, starting something
like the creative learning institute
in their own region/state.
BTW, Mr. Rajendra Kumar BITS is a
good institute and I also believe
that it's not just the institute
where one studies that matter but
the individual matters too. I
remember a friend of mine who used
to say, "I will never use my
college's tag because the
institution does not define my
identity but my actions and
creativity do". My own personal
experience on this has been that the
best of the best don't drop the name
of their institute every now and
then as much as a mediocre person
does. - Som Vishwakarma, USA -
Apr. 18, 2006
When we talk of "the biggest curse"
on a country, it implicitly means
accepting the country to be a cursed
one. One may argue that to accept
having a disease is the first step
towards its remedy. But when someone
describes a pustule to be a
malignant tumor then it appears that
the disease is probably
psychological. And if it happens to
be one's own country/body, it needs
serious attention.
It was good to see this issue
figuring up here, but the article
was written with vengeance. It had
nothing to do with the research
environment or creativity. It was
just to malign the students studied
from the top Indian institutes, to
convey that those talking of merit
are actually no better than a
parrot. What can we do with a
parrot, after all? Well, a computer
with no artificial intelligence is
also like a parrot. A human being is
supposed to have some intelligence
over it. One should know the ways in
which a talent can be utilized.
Some great scientists were
academically poor. Does that prove
that students who are poor in
studies are potentially the "Nobel
prize winner scientists"? If so, I
think we have too much of creativity
everywhere. This logic is like
saying, "Chewing khaini makes me
feel like Dr Rajendra Prasad!"
Why the discussion on creativity was
limited to the field of science and
technology? And why to compare it
with US where most of commodities
are not "Made in America"?
Not having sophisticated weapons was
"one of the” reasons and not the
"only or even prime" reason for
Indians losing wars in history.
The article talks about the false
pride many of Indians have about
their smartness over Americans. And
then the author talks of American's
smartness over Indians. Both
ideologies are fundamentally wrong.
Smartness has nothing to do with
one's origin. Again, being smart and
being creative are two different
things. The article goes further to
prove the value of a scientist over
a technician. This is the same
article which is supposed to talk of
creativity. Why can't a technician
be creative? Must one get a Nobel
Prize to prove his creativity? Has
Raghav Mahto invented a new
technology, proposed a new theory of
communication?
There are many things about the
article which can be argued. But
that will be futile. I wish someone
would have written an article really
on "Promoting Creativity" and would
have discussed the solution as well.
- Kumod Jha - Apr. 18, 2006
Some of the ranting here reminds me
of Asok! Don't underestimate the
power of the American media in the
peoples life. The American media in
general reflects the American public
opinion otherwise they go out of
business. However unfortunate you
may find this but most of the
Americans look at the Indian grocery
shop owners from the prospective of
the Apu character (from the Simpsons)
and the Indian techie from the
prospective of the Asok character
(from Dilbert). Most Americans don't
even know that there is a country
called India but they know
everything about Apu and Asok. I did
not join IIT because my JEE rank
offered me the Mechanical Engg
branch while at BITS I got my
favorite Computer Science branch. I
am glad that I made the right
choice! I feel good that at BITS I
paid for my education with my own
money and did not use the taxpayer’s
money (in India we call it
government's money and think of it
as a nagar vadhu whom anybody and
everybody can enjoy for free). I am
sorry to burst certain peoples
bubble but the truth will prevail
whether I say it or not.
Rajendra Kumar - Apr. 18, 2006
There are people here on this board
who, I think, love to throw
controversial, mostly baseless,
statements just to stir things up.
Then they sit quietly and watch how
we Indians fight among ourselves
while they have fun.
This topic was meant to shake things
up and have some cheap thrills while
others argue and fight. If the
original author is so averse to IITs
and IIT'ians then perhaps he needs
to keep it within himself or discuss
it with his H1B buddies at a local
Indian dosa-shop who will agree with
him no matter how ridiculous his
statements are.
Whether you like it or not - IIT is
one thing that is going in favor of
India. Deal with it. Just because
some of you have negative opinions
about IITs doesn't mean others can't
have their opinions in favor of IITs/IIMs
etc or doesn't mean IIT is a bad
institute. If you don't want people
to respond to your tirade and
baseless innuendoes, don't write it.
You don't have to get upset when
someone tries to defend himself. And
then you people have the nerve to
quickly don the 'chaadar' of "Oh I
am much more enlightened than you
mere mortals - you won't understand
it today but maybe if you grow up
enough you will understand it one
day!! I am much more liberated and
open-minded than you are and that's
why I see things that you idiots
can't see."
Talk about conceit and ego!
How would all of you anti-IIT guys
react if some of us made equally
idiotic statements like all of you
passed your exams by cheating and
got high-paying jobs by using
personal influences? Don't you have
a right to defend yourself? Or
defending oneself is not part of
'being liberated and open-minded?'
You form an opinion (yes, they are
only your personal opinions, not
facts) about something because
certain things happened in your past
and now you preach it as a gospel as
if you have conducted a scientific
research on the subject and have
data to prove it. There is nothing
wrong with having a different
opinion - no matter how negative it
is - but to condemn those who don't
agree with you uncovers your mask of
pseudo-intellectualism.
I don't think the idea behind this
article was to bring something good
in Indian education system - the
idea was to bash IIT'ians for
personal reasons - pure and simple
case of envy and ill-will.
To Mr. Gupta, no apology needed.
It's your opinion and you are free
to have one just like I and millions
of others have the right to disagree
with you, Mr. Vishwakarma, Rajendra
Kumar and others. You don't like
IIT'ians - that's different and
that's your personal opinion that
you are quite entitled to but to
expect that some people will not get
upset with your remarks and not
react angrily is being naive, if not
stupid, to say the least.
If IIT was so bad, why millions of
Biharis continue to demand for it in
Bihar?
Don't bite the hand that feeds you!
- Vikas Agrawal,
USA - Apr. 18, 2006
Kumodji, I am extremely happy to
finally see you breaking your maun
vrat. We have missed your smart alec
comments and articles all these
days. We hope to see your second
innings go a long distance.
It needed a Kumod Jha to defuse the
wired bombs that were on auto
trigger mode. I guess his reply
pretty much sums up the sentiments
of most people who contributed to
this article. - Siddharth Verma -
Apr. 18, 2006
Reading between lines and not
focusing on actual message seems
like become habit of many PatnaDaily
readers.
I have read three time this article
by Mr Som ji. He used IIT word three
times and 2 times with other
institutes like REC etc. How is this
become become anti-IIT? Just can't
believe this is conclusion of so
called intelligent IIT'ians.
One thing apparently have become
very clear that IIT'ian don't like
to hear anything bad about IIT and
want to consider that they are
better than all non IIT'ians just
because some day they cleared IIT-JEE
entrance.
Well, to all IIT'ians who replied to
this article I want to tell all of
you that whatever job in whatever
position you are doing now is done
by non-IIT'ians and some time by
private engineering graduate also.
If you believe you are great then
you will have to do something great
(which I think 200 or so IIT'ians
have done).
If you are doing mundane Java
programming job after your
"prestigious" degree, your
intelligence is at par with another
programmer who did his degree from a
donation based college. Brutal
reality but that is fact. Out of
2000 odd engineers every year 50-100
may be doing great job remaining
1900 hundred is doing just another
mundane job but keep bragging of
their IIT degree 24/7/365.
IIT'ians contribution is far less
for India than Government actually
spend is another bitter but true
fact and you will have to digest
that also.
I have yet to see a job in USA where
they mentioned that they need or
prefer "IIT'ian". - Kaushal Kumar
- Apr. 18, 2006
As
suspected, this was an all-out
anti-IIT debate.
For your information Kaushal Jee,
all of your rants and whining about
IIT (this WAS an anti-IIT article,
trying to dance around the subject
doesn't change a thing) simply
exposes you for what you are - an
IIT-hater. No matter how you
disguise your hatred, it shows up.
It seems like you and your H1B pals
were dying to get it out of your
chest. Well, now that you have said
it, does it make you feel any
better?
What's that old saying... Haathi
chale bazaar...??? By the way, there
were IIT'ians around the globe way
before Java and other programming
languages became the household word
in India.
You H1B people can't think beyond
Java programming, can you? Shows how
much you have to learn and grow.
"I want to tell all of you that
whatever job in whatever position
you are doing now is done by non-IIT'ians
and some time by private engineering
graduate also."
"If you are doing mundane Java
programming job after your
"prestigious" degree, your
intelligence is at par with another
programmer who did his degree from a
donation based college."
"IIT'ians contribution is far less
for India than Government actually
spend is another bitter but true
fact"
"I have yet to see a job in USA
where they mentioned that they need
or prefer "IIT'ian"."
No Kaushal ji, this is not
IIT-bashing, this is merely
statement of facts. Right? If you
want to be fair, why don't you
people talk about your own alma
maters and leave the IIT'ians alone?
Let's see how good they are.
Wasn't it Mr. Vishwakarma who just a
few weeks ago was chastising all
NRIs for being uncouth and boorish?
See his "Top 10 Bad Habits of the
NRIs" in the March section of this
Readers Write area. Now he has
decided to take on the IIT'ians by
making a false allegation that in
IIT rote learning is emphasized. He
has no proof to offer but he is
sticking to his fabricated,
venom-filled story.
Mr. Vishwakarma also condemned the
entire Indian society in his articles
'Raja Beta', 'Land of Buddha',
'Leaders or Beggars' (this time
targeting politicians), and 'Staring
at People - India's Pastime'. The
only article that I could find in
which he didn't directly criticize a
particular group is "There ARE
Alternative of Government Jobs".
Who is going to be your next victim
Mr. Vishwakarma? Are you and your
supporters on this forum the only
people from India who know
everything and are more
sophisticated than the rest of us?
If that's all you can do - spew
venom - against one group or
another, I suggest you leave
PatnaDaily and let others discuss
issues directly related to Bihar. We
don't need a bunch of sore losers
and whiners in this group. I would
go so far as to suggest to
PatnaDaily to ban such negative
forces that are rubbing off on other
otherwise rational contributors like
Kaushal ji.
There is nothing more hideous than
thinking you are the smartest person
on the earth while others are
fumbling morons.
I don't know about others but I am
up to my ears with these pseudo
self-righteous people who are
constantly belittling other groups
in one form or other. - Vikas
Agrawal - Apr. 18, 2006
Mr
Vikas Agrawal come on accept it, you
did attend the coaching institute in
Kota Rajasthan to clear the JEE. Or
at least you used Brilliant
Tutorials or Agrawal Tutorials. Is
this not rote learning? Or are you
denying this too? Ever heard of
similar tutorials for the SAT exams?
Recently the HRD ministry research
indicated that over the past 30
years, compared to an average IIT,
the government of India spent a
fraction of money on University of
Roorkee but got many times better
quality research. Most IIT graduates
do the same job as any other
engineering graduate including the
donation based private colleges but
they don't seem to get out of the
Asok syndrome. In the USA, the hype
about IITs doesn't exist the way it
does back home. So Americans are
forced to evaluate people based
purely on talents and skills and
they end up offering similar salary
and job to Indian techies
irrespective of the educational
institutes they went to. It's
hilarious that the IISc, REC, BITS,
BARC, BHEL and ISRO guys are not
complaining about this article but
only the IIT'ians are? I think we
have hit a landmine here. -
Rajendra Kumar - Apr. 18, 2006
Dear all,
This discussion is going out of
control, people have started using
derogatory remarks against each
other. So I think its better to
windup this topic.
What I felt after reading all the
comments and article that before
writing your comments one need to
tell his background whether he/she
is IIT'ian or not. What a shame, the
way all these educated people are
giving comments regarding our own
institute and country, I can't
believe.
Let me introduce first myself, I'm
not an IIT'ian. I've done most of my
education from some average
University where most of the Indians
are studying.
But I am very much proud of IIT,
IISc, TIFR and all good research
institute of the country. All these
institutes are matter of our
national pride whether I studied
there or not that doesn't make any
difference. I do agree that all
students who are going for study in
these premier institute, they are
some of the best brains of India.
But that doesn't mean that other
chaps who are not able to make to
these institution are rubbish, no
never. If you watch keenly, most of
IITs have more than 50% professors
who have not done their education in
IIT. So what but now they are
shaping the carriers of some best
brains of India.
So you can't define a limit that
IITians are intelligent and others
are not, all these are part of
single system. All of us
collectively working for improvement
of our country, so please don't put
a LAXMAN REKHA between IIT'ian and
non-IIT'ian...
Regarding winning Nobel prize aptly
pointed out by some readers that
it's not very rational, that's true
up to certain extent, but there is
one other major reason and that is:
lack of funding. We are lacking in
funding for research, government is
not providing sufficient fund for
research here. You go and see in USA
their Air force, Navy and other
organisations simply flooding money
for research projects. So we need to
improve a lot in that area.
Here if you apply for a project,
sometimes it takes 6 months to get a
reply from organisations like DRDO/DST/ISRO
and all. I found one organisation
NBHM which is quite efficient in
providing research fund.
So my sincere request from all the
writers that please don't put
derogatory remarks against your own
national premier institute and their
students.
I too think that author of this
article was not very clear what
message he wants to convey, and that
finally leads to such hot and futile
discussion.
Whether you are an IIT'ian or a non-IITian,
don't forget your ethics and
culture. - Guneshwar Anand,
Gandhinagar - Apr. 18, 2006
Rajendra Kumar ji, when I graduated
from IIT, there was no coaching
institute culture in India. Please
don't assume that all those who
visit this site are 20 or
30-something like most of you.
You have hit a landmine of what?
More weapons to assault IIT'ians?
Good luck. - Vikas
Agrawal - Apr. 18, 2006
Somji, another silly debate seems to
be ending. Educated people ended up
snarling, snapping and abusing each
other. Was this discussion required?
What did you expect out of this
discussion? How and who was it
supposed to help? What point did we
prove and what did we achieve? Could
you kindly sum it up for everyone?
Having stirred the hornets' nest
please do not fall silent now. -
Rajesh Chaubey - Apr. 19, 2006
Dear Sirs,
I refer to all as Sirs because
referring all great people as
friends yielded no results hence I
refer them with the title Sir with
expectations that they will have
some second thoughts about on their
venomous comments.
I am not an IIT hater, can anyone
prove that??
Nor did I find any article directed
at demeaning IIT'ians, but when some
learning is imparted out of the
money of hard working tax paying
public then there is an obligation
and moral right of that learned
person to a least accept this fact
at the outset.
In case IIT'ians feel that they are
being targeted then I again
apologise from everyone's behalf for
any pains caused.
Now the question is to what this
article has lead to, what value it
has added to this forum or what has
been learnt from it?
I believe that one can express his
mind in whatever manner he wants but
it should be civil.
I have not come across any language
or sentence which is uncivil so as
to have stirred the emotions of the
IIT'ians or those who have felt bad
by this article and some comments to
it.
One driving example which has been
set up by this article is that we
Indians will always fight amongst
each other if we belong to a
particular group which has received
some unacceptable comments.
Even in case of reservations for the
SC/ST and OBC all the people who do
not belong to these categories went
on to defend that only the no
reservation candidates posses all
the skills in the world a person
from a backward or downtrodden
background is good for nothing.
I will call this a racism in
disguise and also is a stark example
of the normal Indian mentality, we
must respect a human being after all
human being is the only animal
gifted by the sense of speech and
when we open our mouth we spew so
much poison that we forget that we
are hurting our fellow being.
Same is the case with backward and
forward people, people educated at
institutes of high repute and
institutes of lesser known repute.
What difference does it make? In
fact, nothing because at the end of
the day just introspect and you will
find that nothing has been gained
but something has been lost, please
search for that.
Mister Vikas Agarwal has time and
again in this article has felt that
we are targeting the IIT'ians and
have life long hatred for them. Can
he tell me why and how? Has any
non-IIT'ian troubled him in his
life? or made his life miserable?
Then how can he correlate this
article and come to a life long
decision that we are IIT haters?
Come on Sirs, leave this aside and
focus on what you can contribute to
your nation in some way or the other
and if you have really done
something and feel good about it
then there is nothing like that and
if you have not done anything then
life is ahead of you. You still have
miles to go and can do something for
our nation.
I am not ranting patriotic rhymes
neither I consider myself to be a
hardcore patriot but we morally owe
something to our fellow men because
we have been born and brought up
there and there is no one pressing
you for something but consider that
you owe them something and try doing
something for them and if you have
accomplished this then I am sure the
sense of satisfaction shall overcome
all the grief that has been caused
to you because of this article and
come comments to it.
Thanks - Sanjay Gupta - Apr. 19,
2006
Dear Mr. Gupta:
My first reaction to your last
comment was to simply ignore it.
Then I saw terms like 'racism' and
'Indians will always fight amongst
each other' in your message which
led me to respond. This is my last
comment on this topic. Others are
tired of this and so am I. Feel free
to react on it but I will not
respond to it anymore.
First your comments (within quotes),
then my response.
- "I am not an IIT hater, can anyone
prove that??"
I don't have to prove anything to
you or anyone else. I didn't make a
false, hateful statement against
IIT'ians and graduates from other
schools of higher learning. It is
you and your pals who started this
nonsense. You first prove your
allegations with concrete evidences
then we will worry about my
reactions. Opinions don't make
facts.
- "Nor did I find any article
directed at demeaning IIT'ians, but
when some learning is imparted out
of the money of hard working tax
paying public then there is an
obligation and moral right of that
learned person to at least accept
this fact at the outset."
Accept what fact at the outset?
Sorry, but I am lost here. Are you
talking about 'demeaning IIT'ians'?
If yes, to many of us your
allegations didn't sound like
complementary either.
- "In case IIT'ians feel that they
are being targeted then I again
apologise from everyone's behalf for
any pains caused."
Please Mr. Gupta, don't say all the
negative things about a particular
group and then offer your apologies.
If you meant it, you wouldn't have
said it in the first place. It's
like 'maro, magar pyaar se'.
- "Now the question is to what this
article has lead to, what value it
has added to this forum or what has
been learnt from it?"
It has added nothing to this forum
and as far as learning from it is
concerned, we are all free to learn
something from everything. I learnt
that one can accuse someone of
anything and when that someone
defends the baseless, ulterior
allegations, he is showered with
lectures, preaching, and
philosophical rants. I also learnt
that some people automatically
assume that others are idiots
because they refuse to line their
toes with them.
- "I believe that one can express
his mind in whatever manner he wants
but it should be civil."
We are all civil people to a limit.
But the reality is: once that limit
is crossed, all bets are off.
Example: I come and slap your wife
or your mother or your daughter -
you will also become uncivil. More
example: I say you all have stolen
the taxpayer's money to finance your
children's education; again, you
will also become uncivil. And if you
don't - either you are a coward, a
physically challenged person, or
don't have a brain of your own.
Point is, there is a limit to
everything.
- "I have not come across any
language or sentence which is
uncivil so as to have stirred the
emotions of the IIT'ians or those
who have felt bad by this article
and some comments to it."
Mr. Gupta, forget about the literal
sentence and words expressed here.
We all know what their underlying
meanings are. You don't have to add
four-letter words at the end of each
sentence to be insulting. Neither
you have done it nor I have done it
but Mr. Vishwakarma's message is
loud and clear. This is not the
first time he has insulted a
particular group of people, he has a
history of that - at least on this
forum. One writer (I won't mention
the name here but you can easily
guess it) whose articles I used to
enjoy on PatnaDaily was persecuted
by some people here because he
touched some sensitive issues
dealing with history. He was
immediately attacked by a group of
people even though I genuinely felt
he was always driven by sharing
knowledge and have discussions in an
intellectual manner. I never doubted
his intentions for a minute but now
he is forced to write only about
neutral, non-controversial topics
and I for one miss his
thought-provoking write-ups. Mr.
Vishwakarma's intentions, on the
other hand, are quiet different and
most people can see through it now.
- "One driving example which has
been set up by this article is that
we Indians will always fight amongst
each other if we belong to a
particular group which has received
some unacceptable comments."
Again, like Mr. Vishwakarma, you
blame all Indians. Can you, for
heaven's sake, get away from
generalizing and exaggerating your
statements for a change? What do you
mean by 'we Indians'? Here is a fact
for you: this trait of defending
oneself is common among people of
all color, race, religion, language
and country. Whites hurl insults at
Blacks, Blacks will react; a Muslim
falsely calls another Muslim an
agent of America; he will react; an
Israeli makes false allegations
against another Israeli of becoming
a Palestinian supporter, he will
react. This is a normal human
behavior among all homo sapiens. Any
time a false allegation is made
against any person or group,
reaction is expected. Look around,
you will find reactions to something
everywhere. This is quite natural.
Why do you have to keep injecting
morality, Gandhian philosophy,
lessons from Panchtantra ki
Kahaniyan and Bible and
I-am-much-enlightened-than-you are,
or I-am-a-bigger-man-than-you
philosophy every time someone
doesn't agree with you or you run
out of valid arguments? Like I said
before - spare us the lecture. We
know what is right and what is wrong
and how we can try to make the
country and the world stronger. But
if you expect someone to remain
quiet after being insulted over and
over again (The original author of
this article has made it his full
time job to insult Indians) then you
are sadly mistaken. Someone has to
take a stand against someone who
thinks he is the God and the rest
are idiots.
- "Even in case of reservations for
the SC/ST and OBC all the people who
do not belong to these categories
went on to defend that only the no
reservation candidates posses all
the skills in the world a person
from a backward or downtrodden
background is good for nothing."
Another generalization on your part
"ALL the people who do not belong to
these categories went on to
defend..." As for having opinions on
reservation is concerned, that's a
topic for another discussion, not
this one.
- "I will call this a racism in
disguise and also is a stark example
of the normal Indian mentality, we
must respect a human being after all
human being is the only animal
gifted by the sense of speech and
when we open our mouth we spew so
much poison that we forget that we
are hurting our fellow being."
Here we go again! Calling names. So
if someone is opposed to
reservation, he is a racist? Racism
works both ways Mr. Gupta, in case
you are unaware of it. A lower caste
person can hate an upper caste
person with the same passion as a
Ranvir Sena member against a lower
caste person. Or do you truly think
that's just not possible? Why do you
think of only one way traffic? How
would you like if I said that anyone
who doesn't agree with your thoughts
and philosophy becomes an instant
racist/bigot/anti-poor/anti-dalits
in your mind and that makes YOU a
racist? Being open-minded does not
mean we have to take BS from others.
You say it's 'Normal Indian
Mentality'. Normal Indian mentality?
If racism was the normal Indian
mentality today there won't be any
reservation for the SC/ST/OB at all.
Are you, like Mr. Vishwakarma, also
in the habit of exaggerating
everything?
- "Same is the case with backward
and forward people, people educated
at institutes of high repute and
institutes of lesser known repute."
And that's racism? Have you heard of
the word 'envy'? Or even 'friendly
rivalry'? IIt'ians are very proud of
themselves and there is nothing
wrong with it. If you are from BIT,
then you should be proud of it as
well. If one is from P. N. Anglo
Academy or Miller High School, he
should be equally proud of his own
school despite some rivalries from
St. Xavier or St. Michaels. What's
wrong with that or a little friendly
rivalry as long as the two are not
killing each others? Rivalries
between Mets and Braves, Yankees and
Red Sox, Lakers and Celtics (in the
'70s and '80s), Duke and Notre Dame,
Dawgs and Gators, Nicklaus and
Palmer, are legendary in the US.
They all feel superior than the
others but they are not out on the
street with a gun in their hand
trying to kill each other. In fact,
this is what motivates them to be
the best in their fields. Why do you
get so riled up about the IIT'ians
when they are clearly proud of their
background and not trying to hurt
anyone? Could it be even remotely
possible that a lot of people are
simply jealous of them? Could it
be..???
- "What difference does it make? In
fact, nothing because at the end of
the day just introspect and you will
find that nothing has been gained
but something has been lost, please
search for that.
True and that goes for your side as
well.
- "Mister Vikas Agarwal has time and
again in this article has felt that
we are targeting the IIT'ians and
have life long hatred for them. Can
he tell me why and how? Has any
non-IIT'ian troubled him in his
life? or made his life miserable?
Then how can he correlate this
article and come to a life long
decision that we are IIT haters?"
Please, let's not go in circle. We
have already covered this before.
Bring some irrefutable proof of your
allegations against IIT'ians then we
will resume this debate; your
assumptions alone are not enough.
What if I ask you if any IIT'ian has
ever bothered you in your life that
you are so against them? (we both
can play the same game Mr. Gupta).
- "Come on Sirs, leave this aside
and focus on what you can contribute
to your nation in some way or the
other and if you have really done
something and feel good about it
then there is nothing like that and
if you have not done anything then
life is ahead of you. You still have
miles to go and can do something for
our nation."
If you really meant what you are
saying you would have replaced the
word 'you' in the above sentence
with 'us', 'we', and 'our'. I would
have taken it as an offer for truce
if you had said "let's focus on what
WE can contribute to OUR nation...
and if WE have really done
something... etc." You are still
maintaining that 'holier-than-thou'
attitude as if those who don't agree
with you are somehow beneath you.
That is enough to irk a lot of
people including myself.
- "I am not ranting patriotic rhymes
neither I consider myself to be a
hardcore patriot but we morally owe
something to our fellow men because
we have been born and brought up
there and there is no one pressing
you for something but consider that
you owe them something and try doing
something for them and if you have
accomplished this then I am sure the
sense of satisfaction shall overcome
all the grief that has been caused
to you because of this article and
come comments to it."
Not that I disagree with you on this
but all I hear is more lectures and
sermons. You have this strong sense
of superiority complex that is
annoying as anything. You start with
WE and immediately switch over to
YOU. For the last time, we KNOW
about a feel-good, one world-one
people, moralities and duties with
our fellow earth dwellers,
save-the-earth, save-the-whale,
save-the-rain forest, adopt a child
from the Third World for 17 cents a
day, politically-correct world
concept and all that jazz but you
must quit treating us as a student
of a pathshala where you are the
teacher on the subject of morality
and we are the 1st graders who don't
understand a thing about life or the
world. You and Mr. Vishwakarma
assume, and you assume a lot, that
others are idiots and then you, as
if by some unknown force, are
compelled to switch to your non-stop
sermon mode as if you are doing the
world a big favor by showing how
big, magnanimous, open-hearted,
lover of mankind you could be but
others couldn't.
- "Thanks - Sanjay Gupta"
Thanks and regards to you too. You
can have the last word. - Vikas
Agrawal - Apr. 20, 2006
What a breath taking critical
analysis of my comments by Mr. Vikas
Agawral!!
Great !!!
Trust that you had devoted this time
to fully understand the intricacies
of the comments and then analyse it
word by word.
Thanks for your time devotion and
also thanks for having been so kind
as to have accorded your valuable
words to my comments , Mr. AgarwaL.
I would note write anything more
because I know it will be of no
benefit to you but I have had my say
and my message has been received by
one and many and has stirred a
thought process or atleast has given
light to few real and punching
realities.
Okay we accept you and your ilk as
our heroes and do gooders of mankind
and I condemn people like us who
have taken liberty to speak out and
would shut myself up.
One thing please keep in mind that
you are not the deciding authority
to allow or not to allow writers to
post their articles on PD , it is
the Editor who is the authority and
if he had found that our comments
are laced with derogatory remarks,
he would have never allowed it to
surface on PD forum.
Atleast whatever we said , may be
something did not hold water , was
based on pluralistic acceptance and
not just one man's rant against a
particular faction. - Sanjay
Gupta - Apr. 20, 2006
If you raise a prickly point or you
stick to an unpopular point of view,
which you feel serves a cause or the
larger interest of the society, it
is understandable. I have done that
several times and, at times, found
myself in the eye of super-cyclones
and tornadoes.
However, this debate seems silly to
me as I am unable to fathom what
personal provocation led to the
birth of the original article. I am
equally at a loss to understand
that, when no social purpose was
being served, what was the point of
targeting a group of people without
any apparent provocation.
When fishermen catch crabs they do
not need to cover the containers as
crabs are excellent leg pullers. The
crabs at the bottom keep pulling the
legs of the ones trying to climb up
and escape. So all of them stay in
the containers even if they are
uncovered.
As I see it, the singular learning
point coming out from this debate is
that some people, how-so-ever
educated they may be, are like the
crabs. They have a fixation for legs
and love pulling legs. For them life
is the constant journey from one set
of legs to another. The results are
obviously frayed tempers and dirty
words. That is what they are looking
for. They enjoy the splash they
create in the otherwise placid
waters of their lives or, in the
instant case, of PD. Apart from this
I see no reason for pouncing on
anyone without provocation. -
Rajesh Chaubey - Apr. 20, 2006
I read this article two times. The
article was primarily discussing
rote-based merit. IIT was mentioned
in one paragraph (out of the 10
paragraphs) and that too as just one
of the many institutions. Some
people spun the gist of this
article. I think some of these
people have vested interests in the
spin. They want to defend rote-based
learning as ancient Indian culture
and want to call all the OBC/SC/STs
as people without any merit and all
the so called upper castes as the
only people with merit. When you
think lowly about the majority of
Indians then please remember this,
you are a greater danger to the
nation than the foreign militants. -
Rajesh Sahu, Manchester, UK -
Apr. 20, 2006
I have been reading this debate for
last few days. Vikas Agarwal is
right. You only know how to abuse
someone. First you said IIT'ians
were rote learners. Then you called
Indians racist. Now you are calling
them terrorists because they don't
agree with you. - Deepak K. Singh
- Apr. 21, 2006
Rajesh Jee, I have been writing on
the PD forum for a while and so have
you, so I feel I owe you an answer.
I felt our education system was
focusing too much on rote learning
and people need to take a second
look at it. So I wrote this article.
I have written many articles in the
past and this article was nothing
extraordinary. Sometimes people
don't respond to my articles,
sometimes they do so vociferously
and sometimes they even respond to
the responses from the other
readers! In the past one of my
favorite writers in the PD forum has
said that I write mostly about
'Bihar Utthan' and some people have
said I write about social issues and
I think they are correct. The only
vested interest I have in my
writings is the social betterment of
Bihar in particular and India in
general. I write about topics that I
feel are important and dear to me
personally as well as to the
society. I didn't think I stirred
anything, whatever you read in this
forum was already in peoples mind
and it is good that it came out
through a peaceful channel like
writing. Apart from what has already
been pointed out by certain readers,
what else have we learnt from this
article? I don't really know YET,
since learning is a continuous
process and sometimes you don't know
that you have learnt it till you
actually apply it!
I am a supporter of saying what is
on your mind (as long as it is legal
and civil) rather than hiding it and
then suffering from anguish and pain
or surprising people at a later date
when they least accept it.
Communication is the best tool for
healthy relationships both personal
and professional. Anybody who has
been a project manger can confirm
the fact that communication is the
biggest factor for the success of
any project/endeavor; in our case it
happens to be rebuilding Bihar.
Closing our eyes to the issues will
not make them disappear but will
make them more potent. We can think
of the exercise of pointing out the
issues as the discovery phase that
needs to happen before the design,
development and implementation
phases. In case some people feel
that my articles are boring then
they have the right and the choice
to spend their time (and sometimes
their company’s time!) wisely and
read the articles posted by other
folks. My own experience regarding
the PD forum has been excellent. I
highly appreciate the judgment of
the PD editors and their openness to
accept the various diverse views and
opinions that exist in India while
filtering out outright illogical
stuff. That being said, I am having
another idea in my head so let me
start jotting it down! If the PD
editors feel that it is not worth
publishing then as moderators of
this forum I think it is their right
to do so. - Som Vishwakarma, USA
- Apr. 21, 2006
(Editor's
Note: Mr. Vishwakarma's last letter
was received by us AFTER we had
closed this discussion. We made an
exception to our own rule because we
thought he was answering to a
question raised by one of the
posters. Besides, the discussion was
prompted by him and we thought it
would only be appropriate to have
him conclude it as well.
To Mr. Vishwakarma: Please continue
to write. No one is banning you or
anyone else here. We value your
opinions and views and those of
others as well. This is the beauty
of India. We can debate, argue, even
engage in occasional fight but we
are still Indians and love India no
matter where we live, what language
we speak, or what school we have
graduated from. It was an extremely
passionate discussion although we
prefer if everyone keep the tone
just a tad bit down. Thanks to
everyone.) |