|
As
per the figure coming from different sources,
28% of the Indians are below the poverty line.
Let us look at the definitions.
Official estimates are based on a norm of 2,400
calories per capita per day for rural areas and
2,100 calories per capita per day for urban
areas. These calories level, if translated into
money for food, means, anyone earning more than
Rs 600, as of 2005, is considered above poverty
line.
The World Bank defines extreme poverty as living
on less than US$1 (PPP) per day, and moderate
poverty as less than $2 a day. And what it means
in simple word is the dismal living condition.
According to the World Food programme, nearly
50% of the world’s hungry live in India. Another
report says 35% of world’s poor live in India.
Is it not an abysmal situation, extremely
worrying, and sufficient to make you as Indian
look a pygmy?
What is this number? Is it the number of
individuals or households? If it is the number
of individuals, does it include all children as
well as old men who can’t work? If it is
households, does it consider the income of all
the earning members correctly? Are the people
hesitant to give the correct figure just as some
do to escape the income tax?
I see all around and find in households below
BPL, more than one member of the family
contributes to the overall earning of the
household. For example, I have an assistant to
help my wife in household works. We pay him good
money plus all the food and clothing and other
expenses plus some more tips at times. His
mother also works, while his father plies a
rickshaw. I don’t know if these facts are
recorded in data collected. If all the earnings
coming in family are concerned the household
must fall in ‘moderate poverty’ or may be a
little better.
My only apprehension is that the system must not
encourage people to keep themselves in BPL
category. All the schemes must empower them to
be proud citizen and encourage them to explore
all means to improve their earnings.
Let us look at the aspect about going to sleep
without food. Almost 70% of so-called BPL
households live in rural India and most of them
have dwelling of their own. This is a boon, but
one will have to work hard to exploit every bit
of it. The household can grow some vegetables
such as different kinds of pumpkins that grow as
bumper crop. It can grow on the roof of the
house. They can also easily plant some fruit
bearing trees such as jackfruit that can serve
them as some nutritious dishes in their daily
intake and may earn some extra earnings too.
Additionally, the households can also have some
animals such as buffalos, cows, goats and
poultry that can produce the nutritious content
of the food requirements. Why should the
household depend so much on the doles from the
government? Why should they not look into
possibility of growing all that they can?
I know many will not agree to this. However, I
am of strong opinion that unless the people are
empowered to find their own way to earn their
living they shall go on getting more and more
lazy and dependent that can serve only the
politicians.
|
Comments: |
|
No comment so far. |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |