|
India
has nearly 200 national research laboratories,
an equal number of research establishments in
the central sectors, another 1300-odd recognized
R&D units in the industrial sector, besides the
R&D facilities with India’s university system
that constitutes of 237 universities, 39
‘deemed’ universities and 10 institutes of
national importance. DRDO and CSIR have
established its reputations.
India’s institutions add around 200,000 people
to the science and technology pool every year
that is already the world’s largest. What are
all these institutes and its manpower engaged
in? Are the facilities available being utilizing
to the optimum? Can it be made more efficient
and productive to add more revenue or to create
more employment? NASSCOM estimated the global
KPO market to reach $17 billion by 2010, and is
confidant that India will bag about 70% of this
business.
However, the NASSCOM scope of KPO considers only
the traditional areas such as financial
processes, legal work, human resources, in which
India is already doing pretty good business. Why
can’t India leverage its scientific
establishments to pitch in the task and join KPO
providers group that can multiply the Nasscom
revenue estimates many a times?
As reported, India can’t compete with China that
invest $136 billion on R&D. But how do the
majority of the Indian scientists compare with
their Chinese counterparts in output of
researches and its quality? And how can they be
made more motivated in their work? Why can’t the
scientists community improve their performance
to match that of Chinese?
A recent research on the world’s top 1,000 R&D
spenders, consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton
identified smart spenders, who spent a smaller
percentage of revenues on R&D than industry
peers (over a five-year period), but still
performed better. There was one Indian company
in that list of 94 — Tata Motors. “Indian
engineers, with an unbeatable combination of
skill and frugality, may show the way ahead.
Indian companies are spending less, but are
getting more research done per dollar spent.”
But is it true for the scientists and research
workers in government institutions?
Over 500 of India’s largest listed companies put
together spent less than a seventh of what Ford
Motor. Though a loss-making automaker, Ford
spent last year on its R&D $8 billion that
happens to be the world’s largest. These
500-plus companies put together would rank 75 in
the list of the world’s largest R&D spenders
(put out by the Financial Times in its annual
R&D Scoreboard). It’s a poor show. Ranbaxy
Laboratories, the India’s largest spender, would
not make in the global top 300. India must spend
more, and it is happening too. While only three
companies spent more than Rs 100 crore on
research four years ago, today there are 14.
Research investments have grown from Rs 2,405
crore to Rs 5,333 crore in that period. And now,
16 companies have the guts to pour over 10 per
cent of revenues into research.
And interestingly, the centre of gravity in
research is shifting to India and China.
According to Booz Allen Hamilton, growth of
corporate R&D in the two countries (17 per cent)
outpaced North America (5.2 per cent) and Europe
(2.3 per cent).
In the past four years, the automotive
industry’s (excluding component makers) spending
on R&D has increased from Rs 243 crore to Rs 954
crore. The industry also invests 1.5 per cent of
revenues in R&D that was just 0.68 per cent four
years ago.
And one can see that in new platforms on Indian
roads like Tata Motors’ Indica and Ace, and the
forthcoming Rs 1-lakh car, and Mahindra &
Mahindra’s (M&M) Scorpio. However, it is
unfortunate that the huge facilities of R&D is
neither used for BPO nor for developing some
real useful products that can revolutionise the
quality of life of the majority of Indians.
But more surprising is the indifference of our
media that hardly covers even the excellent
success stories of our scientists.
|
Comments: |
|
No comment so far. |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |