Home |Contact Us | Site Map

 

Readers Write Index

 


Chanakya, Chandragupta and Yakshi

by Vipin Singh

January 17, 2006

Readers Write

 

I have always wondered why we read and see more of Chanakya than Chandragupta Maurya? Why Chanakya needed a Chandragupta a ‘Sudra’ to replace Nanda, another ‘Sudra’? Why Chanakya, a ‘Brahman’ didn’t try to become a ‘Samrat’ himself?

Why Sword of Chandragupta didn’t make him corrupt? Why Samrat Ashoka is celebrated more for his repent on violence than his regime of power? Why Amrapaali the ‘Nagarbadhu’ was still considered a celebrity? Why the statue of ‘Yakshi’, which has been dated back to Ashoka period, is wearing a very low waist cloth Which is no different than today’s low waist jeans considering the fact that ‘Yakshi’ is wearing it like a dhoti and not like a sari. Why we don’t see any cloth over her head? Who destroyed these open-minded culture and values? Who made our females third grade citizen in our society, where vast majority of them are being killed even before birth? As per a report it is happening more in affluent middle class. Who destroyed our open culture, was it Bakhtiyar Khilzi, whom we still celebrate in the name of Bakhtiyarpur, who destroyed and burnt the Nalanda University and buried our democratic society of ‘Mahabodhi-Vihar (Bihar)’? If he destroyed our values then why we are so determined on following the rules set by him? Why we are happy to be a big hypocrite society. Why today’s Chanakya, Amar Singh is happy confessing that he flirts with Bollywood actresses and his Chandragupta, Mulayam Singh Yadav is running ‘Operation-Majnoo’, where, forget about youths like me, even middle aged wives and husbands were slapped and humiliated in front of cameras?

Whatever people may say but Bihar has been better in showing respect to females in comparison to many states in India. With 50% reservation for females in Panchayats, Nitish Ji has done a great service to Bihari Society. While our rural Dalit and OBC females have been working outside their house it is now time for our rural upper caste females to break the shackle and come out. Hope this 50% reservation will encourage them. Let there be equal participation of females on their terms in all walks of our life.

Once it is assured, I am sure old values will return.

Comments:
Dear Vipin,

You are right about ‘Yakshi’, I had seen her statue. From the historian point of view these statue tell you a lot about the contemporary culture and I can tell you that even after so many thousands of years ‘Yakshi’ can give complexes to most modern female of today’s world. You are right; she definitely belonged to a society, which was open-minded free from Taliban and Shiv Sena. Depiction of free, healthy and happy female also signifies a free, healthy and happy population. You cover the head of ‘Yakshi’ your whole society gets covered with darkness! - Ruchi, Reading, UK - Jan. 18, 2006

Both extremes are bad. I guess the golden path is the middle one. A society that is too free has a horrible underbelly and so does an oppressive Taliban like society. Look at industrialized societies and their problems which have been elaborated in some detail in the previous articles. While the young in India want to experiment with more and more "freedom" they do not realize what their own status would have been had their parents been "free" people. If father had numerous girl friends (Yakshis), mother (like the celebrated Yakshi) had numerous boy friends and they treated their kids as liabilities. Turning the argument on its head, when they grow up would they like to have "free" kids who are busy being Yakshi or running after Yakshis and who care a hoot for "the old man / woman"?

The ills of a Taliban like society need not be listed as they are numerous. Some where in the middle is a society that is responsible. A society that respects elders and women, loves kids and is friendly. So long as our society is in that band it is good for everyone. Some deviating individuals are found in all societies. One need not worry till these deviating individuals are exceptions rather than the rule. - Rajesh Chaubey - Jan. 18, 2006

Discussion on this topic is now closed.

Return to previous Page

 

 

All rights reserved, 2000-2004, PatnaDaily.Com.