|
I
attended an alumni meet of my school recently.
We were meeting each other after about three
decades. It was very interesting to see how
nearly thirty long years had changed people and
what each of them had achieved in life. The week
before the meet was filled with excitement and
anticipation. Finally the D-day arrived and I
went to the hotel where all were supposed to be
put up. To put it mildly, I was not prepared for
what I saw. I could not recognize some of them.
They had grayed, fattened out, or become bald.
Looking at the wear and tear the years had
claimed on them, I felt time had been very kind
on my looks. I was instantly recognized and hugs
and handshakes followed.
However, looks apart, when we got talking a
strange pattern emerged. The fellows who had
been overly ambitious and the fellows who were
too casual had not done well in life. The
fellows who had wanted pots of money had not
done too well and were living on shoe-string
budgets. It was the middle order batsmen who had
made the centuries. I wondered why this had
happened.
From their talk I could gather that the overly
ambitious people had considered themselves too
good for their jobs. They had not been satisfied
with what their employers gave them and had
changed employers frequently. They were
ultimately jobless and were trying to open
something of there own at this stage of their
lives. Even after so many years they were still
strugglers with an uncertain future but very
certain responsibilities towards their families.
I concluded they had an attitude problem. At the
other extreme were those who took things too
easy in life and ended up in a low profile
existence. Perhaps they were too distracted to
concentrate on what was important. Again I
concluded there was an attitude problem.
The people who had followed the middle path had
done best in their lives. They had worked hard
at their respective jobs and, slowly but
steadily, had risen up the ranks to occupy
important positions.
I concluded that the grabbers had got little and
the tension had claimed its toll on their looks
as well. On the other hand were the givers, who
worked hard loyally through thick and thin. They
were the people who had got a lot from life.
They seemed satisfied, good humored, relaxed and
friendly. It seemed funny. The people who ran
after pots of money were on shoe string budgets
while those who led less hungry lives had far
more to spare.
|
Comments: |
|
No comment so far. |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |